Jane Eyre
Directed by Cary Fukunaga
Screenplay by Moira Buffini
after the novel by Charlotte Bronte
2011
The BBC Films logo comes straight on the screen credits before it begins. The BBC’s raison d’être is doing 19th century female novelists. It’s probably in their foundation document (The BBC shall unless otherwise excluded from doing so by war or famine or Acts of God, produce two serials a year by 19th century female novelists, plus a Dickens and a Hardy). Their move into film co-production carries their history.
Jane Eyre is a biggie. How many versions have people seen? These things have a function. A close relative gained A-levels in English (grade A star) solely on TV and film versions of the set books. No actual type inferfered with her studies on the flickering screen and sixth formers for years to come will bless this version. Jane Eyre is also a hard one. You know the ending. You’re tempted to yell ‘Watch out! Behind you! There’s a mad woman upstairs with a box of matches / flint!” and ‘Don’t do it! He’s already married!’
Mia Wasikowska as Jane Eyre
The 2011 version wins on locations and direction, and on having a Jane Eyre who is exactly my mental picture of Jane Eyre. If she wasn’t before, she is now. Rochester’s easier to do … an intense manly actor with breeches and big sideburns does the trick. Jane Eyre is ethereal, but stubborn. Poor and plain, but incredibly attractive. Independent but in a servile position. It’s a complex role, but it’s no problem.
The light in the film is astonishing. You’re in early 19th century interiors. You can feel what it’s like to have your boundaries set by the flicker of a candle and the glow of a wood fire. Every other film that portrays this does the Festen thing: you can’t see what’s going on at all through the murk. This production lets you see what’s happening but gives you the whole of the moon. mood.
Judi Dench in bonnet as usual as Mrs Fairfax
Mia Wasikowska as Jane Eyre, is, it turns out, Australian of Polish origin. Well, she convinces me totally as a North-Eastern English lass. Now there’s a North Yorkshire face if ever I saw one, I thought. Judi Dench (Mrs Fairfax) has spent many years of her career in a bonnet and long dress, and immediately inhabits the role so definitively that you can’t imagine anyone else doing it. Michael Fassbender (German-Irish) does the Mr Rochester sideburns acting. And acts the sideburns with aplomb. Mind you, with him having such a big one (the castle, that is) it’s difficult to believe he’s a mere Mr. And a bigger surprise not to see Colin Firth playing the part. We thought that was obligatory under the BBC Charter with Austen / Brontes / Elliot. But after the King’s Speech he’s become cuddly and Rochester isn’t cuddly. The castle looks duchal at least. The young actors are outstanding … Amelia Clarkson as Young Jane, and Romy Settbon Moore as Adèle. The boarding school scenes are particularly powerful. Sally Hawkins confounds those who identify her with her Made in Dagenham role by doing the evil auntie, Mrs Reed.
Michael Fassbender as Mr Rochester
There are Speilbergian surprises, that sudden stuff to make the audience leap up with a start (though not the fire in Rochester’s bedroom strangely … that was somewhat tame when it needed to be terrifying). They saved the dramatic intensity for the discovery of the wounded Richard instead.
There were genuine laugh out loud lines, hardly to be expected with this story, from both Jane Eyre and Mrs Fairfax. They’re not played for comedy, just well-placed, well-timed and surprising.
The North Moors locations are the co-stars with Mia Wasikowska in a version of the well-known story that will resonate for years. It’s the best it’s been done.
[…] of the 2011 film of Jane Eyre added. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this […]
LikeLike
Pter
It is a damning indictment of Brtitain’s “A-level” system that you can star in English literature without reading the book!
LikeLike
There are two parts to the approach. First you need to watch two or preferably three versions. The second is to obtain American “pass notes” not the British ones of which every word is known to the poor examiner.
We couldn’t get away with it because they made us read large chunks aloud around the class even at A level.
LikeLike
Call me a caveman but I find this material ponderous. My wife enjoys it but for me, it cures insomnia. Thankfully this was not required reading in the states (at least not in my classes). They bored us to tears with Shakespeare – sorry Peter, I know you are a fan, I just couldn’t(and can’t) wrap my pea brain around it.
LikeLike
I never had a problem with the Brontes, but I was always a Neanderthal about Jane Austen and thought 16-18 year old males should never be forced to study it. It definitely has no appeal to males of that age. But Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights are excellent at any age. I get fed up with BBC Austen, but this is much more exciting.
Now if they bored you to tears with Shakespeare, the teachers were at fault. Our school had the sense to start with “Macbeth.’
LikeLike
Considering every high school English (now called Literacy) teacher in America has to teach it at some point, there is no doubt that the average to lousy teacher outnumbers the good. However, I can’t just blame teachers. I’ve never been into the whole manner in which they talk. It’s too long, laborious and riddled with symbolism that means nothing to me in the context in which it is delivered. I’ve tried many times to “culture” myself but alas, it has always escaped my feeble capacities.
LikeLike
Ah! Hoist with your own petard, there, Brien. Seriously, if ever you’re in England, we’ll should do Stratford and convert you.
LikeLike